All things strange, weird and bat-shit crazy
Monday, December 20, 2010
Graham Hancock, BBC - Atlantis Reborn Again (3) (HIDDEN HISTORY, LOST CIVILIZATIONS SERIES)
Thisseries has been uploaded following a request and information recieved that it was not easily available. If you are aware of a title on any subject which is not generally available, or can't be found on YouTube - Please contact us and we'll see if we can locate and then upload it. TheYouArchive
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Thisseries has been uploaded following a request and information received that it was not easily available. If you are aware of a title on any subject which is not generally available, or can't be found on YouTube - Please contact us and we'll see if we can locate and then upload it. TheYouIndex
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I believed the theories of hancock and bauval for quite a long time, but books by real scientists and experts in this field as well as excellent documentaries such as this one have disproved them.
ReplyDeleteInstead of antagonizing Hancock's theory, why not show some addtl support/proof pointing his way? Lets face it, this BBC special's objective is to prove him wrong and discredit him for his insights. Lets be real, most innovative ideas requires "fine tuning" as more evidence and facts show up. The ONE thing many mainstream scientist CAN'T dispute is the similarity between all the pyramids on this earth, that's a fact! This is the whole theory behind Hancock's ideas, there's a connection there
ReplyDeleteSo, Dr Spence is arguing here is that the three pyramids at Giza are aligned in their particular formation due to building foundation restrictions rather than being an image of Orion's three belt stars. OK, but isn't it also a bit strange that only three Pharaohs decided to build a pyramid for themselves on the site? Why not four or five or eight? Sorry Dr Spence but your hypothesis fails to identify how masterly these builders were. And they were a bit useful in Astronomy to boot!
ReplyDelete@AndreHiltre I don't believe in anything. I have an idea. Ideas can change, evolve and adapt easily. A belief is far more difficult to change. To be fair though dude, you kind of brought it on yourself. Your first comment might as well have been- "Drugs are bad. Hancock does drugs. His research is bad because he does drugs."- which is slightly unfair. Hancock has been involved in tribal and shamanic rituals in order to gain a better understand of local tradition and thinking.
ReplyDelete@yodabejedi
ReplyDeleteWhat do you believe in? Apart from being a cunt.
@AndreHiltre Oh and sorry, I forgot your thumbs up, so here's one on both comments just to cheer you up :)
ReplyDelete@AndreHiltre You learned to read by 13? Mother would be so proud of you. Did I argue about his evidence? Did I argue his research? No. Indeed I did not on both accounts. Deeply and widely you say? Know what else can be deep and wide? The obvious "your mothers vagina" joke aside I'm going to say...a box. The fact that you get so wound up kinda shows that you've maybe went down the wrong path.
ReplyDelete@yodabejedi
ReplyDeleteActually, you self righteous little prick, I have thought deeply and widely outside the box. I read my first Hancock book when I was 13, Sign and Seal, and as a small kid I thought he was the man. After searching for truth for many years I have found several paths worthy for further research. Unfortunately, the evidence put forward by Hancock in some of his best sellers doesnt add up. He selects parts that back his theory and ignores the rest. Well, it made him $130 million.
@AndreHiltre I can't say the man hasn't done any drugs, but someone that writes that as a comment is someone that has never thought outside the box. Good luck with your 'in the box' thinking. I hope it brings you nothing but mediocre thinking and a status quo way of thinking. I'm going to give you a 'thumbs up' for having no life experience other than that of which you have been taught. Well done for such close-mindedness.
ReplyDelete@AndreHiltre lol maybe you should do some drugs, might open your mind a little. you really think they were limited to building the pyramids perfectly on north and south , pretty much the center of the earth
ReplyDeletelol bbc is a joke, so is egyptology, so close minded... all for there agenda
ReplyDeleteHancock is a drug fuelled charleton.
ReplyDeletebut how did they know about north and south? the earth was thought to be flat in those days.
ReplyDeletei don't believe that such a massive undertaking was taken based only on logistics... why spend so much effort and time to build in a random location?
ReplyDeleteor an ad hominem attack against the Ancient Egyptians, for not building their pyramids according to what Hancock thinks they should have.
ReplyDelete''anal-retentive bureaucrats''......a perfect description of the bbc.
ReplyDelete@h0nkeyk0ng want
ReplyDeletethey dont wat him to be right
ReplyDeleteif indeed these ice sheets are 400,000 years old then it really is a question how it was mapped by ....some one as shown by the youtube video {Piri Reis Map explained by Graham Hancock} and indeed in my view lends to an even bigger mystery, dont you think !!!!!
ReplyDelete